Re: adopting phat
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 12:51:11PM +0200, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
> Hi Eric,
> |--==> Eric Dantan Rzewnicki writes:
> EDR> On Mon, Jul 09, 2007 at 11:46:37AM +0200, Free Ekanayaka wrote:
> >>Hi Eric,
> >>svn-inject -o <package>.dsc svn+ssh://your-login@svn.debian.org/svn/demudi
> >>
> >>(you will need the svn-buildpackage package installed
> EDR> Doing it like that injected the phat docs and source into
> EDR> /branches/upstream/. From looking at what's in svn for most of the
> EDR> demudi packages, it seems this is not what I want. Most packages have a
> EDR> /branches/upstream/ directory, but they are largely empty.
> EDR> Perhaps what I want is to use --no-branches?
>
> Mmh, the -o option should be enough (see svn-inject). By the way, I've
> run svn up but I can't see the sources you've imported. I've seen
> you've deleted your import, if you need help with that just let me
> have the source package and I'll do that for you.
I can handle it. I just got freaked out and assumed I had done something
wrong. The existing diff touches a lot more than I expected it would
need to. I should have looked through it before svn-injecting. Sorry for
the false start.
> EDR> I'll go read the svn-buildpackage docs before I mess it up again.
> EDR> I was going to inject the existing packaging for future reference before
> EDR> I start on the new one. Is that worthwhile?
>
> Definitely I would do that.
Ok. thanks.
-eric Rz.
Reply to: