On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 10:42:14PM +0000, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > which was filed against the rosegarden package. > > It has been closed by Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>. > > Their explanation is attached below. If this explanation is > unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate > message then please contact Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> by replying > to this email. I've the same problem with 1.5.0-3 Please reopen Regards Jean-Luc > > Debian bug tracking system administrator > (administrator, Debian Bugs database) > > From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> > To: "Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh)" <jean-luc.coulon@wanadoo.fr>, > 412978-done@bugs.debian.org > Subject: Re: Bug#412978: rosegarden: is uninstallable (depends on libjack0 which doesnt exist) > X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 > (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on rietz.debian.org > X-Spam-Level: > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROMDEVELOPER, > HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 > > Version: 1:1.5.0-3 > found 412978 1:1.5.0-2 > thanks > > On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 02:28:37PM +0100, Jean-Luc Coulon (f5ibh) wrote: > > > The version 1.5.0-2 is uninstallable as it depends of libjack0 which is not > > available. > > .... > > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > > rosegarden: Depends: libjack0 (>= 0.102.20) but it is not installable > > E: Broken packages > > > The available version of libjack is: > > libjack0.100.0-0 version 0.102.20-1 > > Already fixed in version 1:1.5.0-3. > > -- > Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS > Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. > vorlon@debian.org http://www.debian.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature