Your message dated Sun, 23 Jul 2006 03:51:52 -0400 with message-id <1153641112.7773.33.camel@localhost.localdomain> and subject line no longer a dummy package has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: revtex4: Dummy package still needed?
- From: Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña <jfs@computer.org>
- Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 00:48:17 +0200
- Message-id: <20050808224817.GV2460@silicio>
Package: rosegarden Version: 2.1pl4-2 Priority: wishlist This dummy package is present in sarge, etch and sid. As this is a dummy transition-only package (for woody), is there a reason why this package should still exist in the distribution? Notice that we currently only support upgrade paths from stable (currently sarge) to "new stable" (currently etch) and in both these distributions this package is a dummy package. For more information read the Release Notes [1]. If this package is no longer required, please ask for its removal by reassigning this bug to ftp.debian.org or remove the package from your control file in your next upload. Also please reassign its 7 bugs, if appropiate, to the package that replaces it. Regards Javier [1] http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/release-notes/ch-upgrading#s-system-statusAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 322064-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: no longer a dummy package
- From: Mike O'Connor <stew@vireo.org>
- Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 03:51:52 -0400
- Message-id: <1153641112.7773.33.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Version: 1:1.2.3-1 rosegarden is no longer a dummy package. It now replaces rosegarden2 and rosegarden4 packages (which still exist in order to provide an upgrade path for sarge->etch). thanks, stew
--- End Message ---