Re: [Agnula-Developers] Re: jack 0.75 mini-freeze
On Sat, 6 Dec 2003, Andrea Glorioso wrote:
> [Keeping only debian-multimedia and developers@lists.agnula.org on the
> recipients' list, as I suspect it's not that interesting for the other
> original recipients]
>
> >>>>> "ju" == Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp> writes:
>
> >> Do we have a plan how to handle this with future JACK packages
> >> ?
> >>
> >> I think that it would be better to include the strict
> >> dependency rules in the packages instead of forcing them by the
> >> naming scheme of the JACK libraries. Several of the packages
> >> that rely on JACK only use a subset of its API, and therefore
> >> work across several releases. Others don't (e.g. those
> >> including the transport API), they have to depend on specific
> >> libjack versions.
>
>
> ju> I've got an impression that by the time we actually get this
> ju> release in, we are probably going to be looking at 0.90, which
> ju> should be more stable, and then we'll probably be looking at
> ju> 1.0, which should be two more ABI changes; which isn't too
> ju> bad.
>
> For the record, at:
>
> http://apt.agnula.org/pool/main/j/jack-audio-connection-kit/
>
> you can find an unofficial package of Jack 0.90.1. The sources.list
> lines are:
>
Most probably we'll stick to Jack 0.90.1 for the DeMuDi 1.1
forthcoming release. All packages that depend on jack will be
rebuilt against the 0.90.1 library.
Best regards,
Free Ekanayaka
Reply to: