ftp.debian.org == saens *fixed*
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
- Subject: ftp.debian.org == saens *fixed*
- From: Simon Paillard <email@example.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 13:28:41 +0200
- Message-id: <20070802112841.GB19021@dedibox>
- In-reply-to: <20070626144032.GA6736@dedibox>
- References: <1182866393.25737.3.camel@ausi> <20070626144032.GA6736@dedibox>
Saens == ftp.debian.org is now fixed, and should be updated soon.
Don't knwo whether dropping amd64 would be a good idea or not.
Anyway, ftp.debian.org should not be a reference for users in my opinion
(otherwise, doing GeoDNS on it could be a solution)
----- Forwarded message from James Troup via RT <firstname.lastname@example.org> -----
Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2007 13:47:09 -0600
From: James Troup via RT <email@example.com>
Subject: [rt.debian.org #129] Debian RT: ftp.debian.org == saens not updating
On Fri Jul 20 16:26:26 2007, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> Once again, nicely reported by Ricardo :
> http://220.127.116.11/debian/project/trace/ is three days behind !
It's now fixed again. Sorry for the delay.
> Could something reliable be done on saens to avoid such issues ?
The machine is running out of space, can't fit any more drives, doesn't
have a local admin readily available to do a disk swap on-site and the
machine's sponsor/donor was unwilling or unable to provide new drives
last time I asked. We're looking at alternative places to put a new
ftp.debian.org, but it's not as trivial as you make it sound I'm afraid.
----- End forwarded message -----