Re: OpenSSL on mips64el
On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 4:35 PM Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
<sebastian@breakpoint.cc> wrote:
>
> The current openssl package fails to build in unstable/ experimental due
> to a failure in the testuite. The unstable build has been retried three
> times with the same outcome. I tried ti build it on the porterbox is
> succeeded on the first attempt.
> Based on db.d.o I would assume that eberlin and mipsel-osuosl-03/ 05 are
> both Loongson 3A4000 and therfore identical. One has 4GiB ram and the
> other 16GiB so maybe not identical.
I might have my wires crossed, but should Debian be building the FIPS
version of the library?
>From <https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=openssl&arch=mips64el&ver=3.6.0%7E%7Ealpha1-1&stamp=1757461246&raw=0>:
make[4]: Entering directory
'/build/reproducible-path/openssl-3.6.0~~alpha1/build_shared'
( SRCTOP=.. \
BLDTOP=. \
PERL="/usr/bin/perl" \
FIPSKEY="f4556650ac31d35461610bac4ed81b1a181b2d8a43ea2854cbae22ca74560813" \
EXE_EXT= \
/usr/bin/perl ../test/run_tests.pl )
00-prep_fipsmodule_cnf.t ..
# The results of this test will end up in test-runs/prep_fipsmodule
1..1
HMAC : (KAT_Integrity) : Pass
HMAC : (Module_Integrity) : Pass
...
KEM_Encap : (KAT_KEM) : Pass
KEM_Decap : (KAT_KEM) : Pass
KEM_Decap_Reject : (KAT_KEM) : Pass
Failed to load FIPS module
INSTALL FAILED
C0EA0FF1FF000000:error:1C8000D4:Provider
routines:SELF_TEST_post:invalid
state:../providers/fips/self_test.c:336:
C0EA0FF1FF000000:error:1C8000D8:Provider
routines:OSSL_provider_init_int:self test post
failure:../providers/fips/fipsprov.c:1004:
C0EA0FF1FF000000:error:078C0105:common libcrypto
routines:provider_init:init
fail:../crypto/provider_core.c:1045:name=fips
../../util/wrap.pl ../../apps/openssl fipsinstall -pedantic -module
../../providers/fips.so -provider_name fips -section_name fips_sect
-out ../../test/fipsmodule.cnf => 1
not ok 1 - fips install
# Failed test 'fips install'
# at ../test/recipes/00-prep_fipsmodule_cnf.t line 33.
# Looks like you failed 1 test of 1.
Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
Failed 1/1 subtests
> Anyway since it fails and the buildd and succeeds on the porterbox, what
> could be done next?
Jeff
Reply to: