[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#983706: gzip FTBFS on mips64el: FAIL: timestamp



On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 10:59:20AM +0800, YunQiang Su wrote:
> Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org> 于2021年3月1日周一 上午7:13写道:
> >
> > Source: gzip
> > Version: 1.10-2
> > Severity: serious
> > Tags: ftbfs
> >
> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=gzip&arch=mips64el&ver=1.10-3&stamp=1614531854&raw=0
> 
> It seems due to some problem of kernel or filesystem:
>...
> > On the porterbox eller, 1.10-2 fails the same as 1.10-3.
> > 1.10-3 builds in a buster chroot.

This implies that what changed is in userspace.

>...
> On x86:
> syq@vm208:~$ touch -t 196912312359.59 in
> syq@vm208:~$ ls -l in
> -rw-r--r-- 1 syq syq 0 Dec 31  1969 in
> syq@vm208:~$ cp -a in in.xx
> syq@vm208:~$ ls -l in.xx
> -rw-r--r-- 1 syq syq 0 Dec 31  1969 in.xx
> 
> On mips:
> syq@m530-2:~/tmp/gzip/gzip-1.10/builddir$ ls -l in
> -rw-r--r-- 1 syq syq 0 Dec 31  1969 in
> syq@m530-2:~/tmp/gzip/gzip-1.10/builddir$ cp -a in in.xx
> syq@m530-2:~/tmp/gzip/gzip-1.10/builddir$ ls -l in.xx
> -rw-r--r-- 1 syq syq 0 Feb  7  2106 in.xx

On eller the difference is that in buster
the "ls -l in" already shows the 2106 date:

(buster_mips64el-dchroot)bunk@eller:~$ ls -l in
-rw-r--r-- 1 bunk bunk 0 Feb  7  2106 in

(sid_mips64el-dchroot)bunk@eller:~$ ls -l in
-rw-r--r-- 1 bunk bunk 0 Dec 31  1969 in


cu
Adrian


Reply to: