Martin Pitt [2015-06-01 8:02 +0200]: > Since this doesn't happen on our mipsel porter box, and I don't have > any other mipsel hardware to check this on, it seems this needs some > help from the mipsel buildd maintainers. It would be really helpful if > our buildd and the porter box were more alike, to be able to reproduce > such issues? Today's upload had no test failures: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=systemd&arch=mipsel&ver=220-3&stamp=1433167263 This was built on mipsel-aql-01. Looking into the history on https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=systemd&arch=mipsel it seems that mipsel-aql-01 never failed, while mipsel-manda-01 recently always failed, and eberlin is somewhat random. I guess one shouldn't read too much into that short history, presumably they are all a bit flaky. But do you know anything fundamental (kernel version etc.) where the porter box (eder) is different from these buildds? Thanks, Martin -- Martin Pitt | http://www.piware.de Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Developer (www.debian.org)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature