Re: o32 != n32
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 3:14 AM, David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 05/15/2015 11:29 AM, YunQiang Su wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 2:08 AM, David Daney <ddaney.cavm@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/15/2015 10:46 AM, Steven J. Hill wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Based on the conversations, is the summary below correct?
>>>>
>>>> Steve
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ABI Debian Repository Cores multilib Possible?
>>>> --- ----------------- ----------- -------------------------
>>>> o32 Any 32 & 64 bit 32-bit (NO), 64-bit (YES)
>>
>>
>> o32 Any 32 & 64 bit 32-bit (Yes, N32), 64-bit (YES)
>
>
> I don't know what you mean by this.
>
> Certainly we can agree that n32 requires a 64-bit CPU and kernel. So,
> either you are incorrect, or I misunderstand what you are trying to say.
Sorry, I misunderstand this table.
It means (the situation of 32bit CPU, the situation of 64bit CPU)
>
> David Daney
>
>
>
>>
>>>> o64 None/Never 64-bit only N/A
>>>> n32 None/Never 64-bit only N/A
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> n32 can, and does, easily coexist in a multi-lib environment with o32 and
>>> n64.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> n64 IMGTEC 64-bit only YES
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
--
YunQiang Su
Reply to: