[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#708143: mips64(el) and mipsn32(el) support with multilib

This new one won't define TARGET for control.m4 when
with_deps_on_target_arch_pkgs=yes is used.

With this patch,
1. echo "mips64el" > debian/target
   with_deps_on_target_arch_pkgs=yes DH_VERBOSE=1 \
   DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nostrip BACKPORT=false dpkg-buildpackage -b -uc -us -d -nc
successfully build with
and lib*_mips64el.deb out.

2. dpkg-buildpackage -B successfully build for native amd64 build.

3. dpkg-buildpackage failed to build with an error
    dh_installdeb -pgcj-4.8-source
dh_md5sums -pgcj-4.8-source
dh_builddeb -pgcj-4.8-source
dpkg-deb: building package `gcj-4.8-source' in
touch stamps/08-binary-stamp-libgcjsrc
mkdir -p /tmp/buildd/gcc-4.8-svn/gcc-4.8-4.8.1/build/java-src
cd /tmp/buildd/gcc-4.8-svn/gcc-4.8-4.8.1/build/java-src && fastjar -xf
Error! CRCs do not match! Got 264aca47, expected 95962ba4
make[1]: *** [stamps/05-build-javadoc-stamp] Error 1

4. the native mips64el one is building. More than 10 hours will be needed.

On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:52 AM, YunQiang Su <wzssyqa@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 8:55 PM, Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> wrote:
>> Am 03.08.2013 08:58, schrieb YunQiang Su:
>>> Hi, I refresh this patch to 4.8.1-8
>>> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 11:52 PM, YunQiang Su <wzssyqa@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I refresh this patch with 4.8.1-6
>>>> This version patch add multilib support.
>> fixed some chunks and removed some chunks from the patch.
> You removed the lib32loc chunks, while they may be needed.
> As there is something special for mips*:
> They asked to put o32 libraries to /lib, and n32 in /lib32,
> n64 in /lib64 if not multiarched on any platform
> So on mips64(el) platform, lib32 is used by n32 abi, while /lib is for o32.
> I have to do it like this.
>> the patch was never tested on amd64. It's amd64, not x86_64.
>> why are the configured_libdir changes necessary? left them out for now. same for
>> the changes in debian/rules.d/*
> It was my fault.
>> please check the version in the vcs.
> I have read it and add some more fix.
> The attachment is the diff of it with the svn r6944
> I am testing it on cross mips64el on amd64
> amd64 native and mips64el native build.
>> are there test summaries available for the current builds?
I will give you the buildlog when mips64el build finished.
>> please make sure that the changed multiarch definitions are applied upstream.
>>   Matthias
> --
> YunQiang Su

YunQiang Su

Attachment: mips64el.diff
Description: Binary data

Reply to: