[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#708143: mips64 and mips64el support without multilib

I refreshed this patch to add multilib support for mips64(el) and mipsn32(el)

The mips* ask for o32 libraries to be put in /lib and /usr/lib, which
make the change to
debian/rules2 a little longer.

With this package gcc-4.8 can build successfully on amd64, mipsel and mips64el.

Besides the mips64(el) and mipsn32(el) support, I add support of
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS=nocheck support.

On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 10:57 AM, YunQiang Su <wzssyqa@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 11:16 PM, Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> wrote:
>> Am 13.05.2013 15:37, schrieb YunQiang Su:
>>> Package: gcc-4.8
>>> We are working on mips64(el) port.
>>> The support of these architectures are finished, while multilib is still to do.
>>> This is the patch.
>> You are introducing a new configuration, separate from the existing mips64
>> configurations.  Could you explain why?  And you keep the same multiarch name
> My fault, I will merge them.
>> for both configurations. How do the new mips64 targets and the existing mips64
>> multilib relate to each other?
> I will support multilib finally.
> As my understand, the multilib-less is a step to the multilib support. Is it?
> I am very not sure.
>>   Matthias
> --
> YunQiang Su

YunQiang Su

Attachment: mips64.diff
Description: Binary data

Reply to: