[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Maybe a Problem with "tip22"



Hi,

The screen shot in Attilio's bug report was done by me on my Indy. I am not experienced in this beginning of the universe kind of code. But I found the following clues which may be useful.

Please refer to bug 452798 (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=452798). Here is message #15 from Guido:
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 01:02:25PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
How much work is 64 bit support?
It's not the 64bit support, things are simply not fitting into the
memory segment we use anymore:

Tip22 finds this memory map on my Indy:

1) Free Memory(3) segment found at (0x88002000,0x88740000)
2) Free Memory(3) segment found at (0x88800000,0x89002000)
3) Free Memory(3) segment found at (0x896f2000,0x94000000)

(1) is where the running kernel + initrd goes. (2) is where we tell the
prom to download the tftpboot image to and (3) is lots of free space.
The 64bit kernel (7MB) is just so much bigger than the 32bit one.

Attached is a hack to get things booting again (so installer testing can
proceed). It puts the tftp boot file into (3) and the initrd into (2) -
it succesfully boots a kernel with an initramfs on my R5K Indy. I'll
have to change some of the reservation code so we don't waste so much
ram before I can fix this for real though.
Cheers,
 -- Guido

	Here is the "objdump -x" output of the "netboot-boot.img" from Lenny:
debbootL.img:     file format ecoff-bigmips
debbootL.img
architecture: mips:3000, flags 0x00000032:
EXEC_P, HAS_SYMS, HAS_LOCALS
start address 0x897020cc

Sections:
Idx Name Size VMA LMA File off Algn
  0 .text         00001e00  89702000  89702000  000000d0  2**4
                  CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, CODE
  1 .data         00ad1500  89703e00  89703e00  00001ed0  2**4
                  CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, DATA
  2 .bss          00000040  8a1d5300  8a1d5300  00000000  2**4
                  ALLOC
SYMBOL TABLE:
[  0] e 00000000897038b8 st 1 sc 1 indx fffff     strcpy
[  1] e 0000000089703e00 st 1 sc 2 indx fffff     kernel_load
[  2] e 0000000089702a30 st 1 sc 1 indx fffff     ArcGetPeer
[  3] e 00000000897033a8 st 1 sc 1 indx fffff     printf
[  4] e 0000000089703e34 st 1 sc 2 indx fffff     stdout
[  5] e 0000000089702de4 st 1 sc 1 indx fffff     vsprintf
[  6] e 0000000089703e00 st 1 sc 2 indx fffff     _fdata

	And here is the objdump -x" output of the "netboot-boot.img" from Squeeze:
debbootS.img:     file format ecoff-bigmips
debbootS.img
architecture: mips:3000, flags 0x00000032:
EXEC_P, HAS_SYMS, HAS_LOCALS
start address 0x888020cc

Sections:
Idx Name Size VMA LMA File off Algn
  0 .text         00001ea0  88802000  88802000  000000d0  2**4
                  CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, CODE
  1 .data         00982140  88803ea0  88803ea0  00001f70  2**4
                  CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, DATA
  2 .bss          00000040  89185fe0  89185fe0  00000000  2**4
                  ALLOC
SYMBOL TABLE:
[  0] e 0000000088803914 st 1 sc 1 indx fffff     strcpy
[  1] e 0000000088803ea0 st 1 sc 2 indx fffff     kernel_load
[  2] e 0000000088802a30 st 1 sc 1 indx fffff     ArcGetPeer
[  3] e 00000000888033a8 st 1 sc 1 indx fffff     printf
[  4] e 0000000088803ed4 st 1 sc 2 indx fffff     stdout
[  5] e 0000000088802de4 st 1 sc 1 indx fffff     vsprintf
[  6] e 0000000088803ea0 st 1 sc 2 indx fffff     _fdata

It seems to me that what Guido wanted was done in Lenny but not in Squeeze. In the screen shot, "initrd" was being copied into 0x88800000 by the Squeeze image. Wouldn't it overwrite the loader?

I downloaded the Squeeze "tip22" package, and here is the beginning of the "ld.script.IP22" script:
OUTPUT_FORMAT("ecoff-bigmips")
OUTPUT_ARCH(mips)
ENTRY(_start)
SECTIONS
{
  /* XXX: place the loader after the kernel */
  . = 0x88802000;

  /* read-only */
  _text = .;                    /* Text and read-only data */
  .text : {
    _ftext = .;
    *(.text .text.*)
    *(.rodata*)
  } =0

  _etext = .;                   /* End of text section */
  PROVIDE (etext = .);



	Thanks for your help!


Edwin


Reply to: