Re: regressions in the binutils test suite on mips{,el}
Matthias Klose a écrit :
> Package: binutils
> Version: 2.19.51.20090827-1
> Severity: serious
> Tags: help
>
> Regressions compared to 2.19.51.20090805-1
>
> See:
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=binutils&ver=2.19.51.20090827-1&arch=mips&stamp=1251415690&file=log
>
> https://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=binutils&ver=2.19.51.20090827-1&arch=mipsel&stamp=1251398762&file=log
>
> Test results, compared with installed binutils:
> W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16e (sb1)
> W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16e (octeon)
> W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): mips16-64
> W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): mips16e save/restore
> W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16 reloc
> W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): mips16
> W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16 reloc 2
> W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16 lui/addi
> W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16e (mips64)
> W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16e (mips32r2)
> W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16e (mips64r2)
> W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16e (xlr)
> W: [gas/mips/mips.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16e (mips32)
> W: [ld-mips-elf/mips-elf.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16 PIC test 1
> W: [ld-mips-elf/mips-elf.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16 PIC test 2
> W: [ld-mips-elf/mips-elf.exp] REGRESSION (PASS -> FAIL): MIPS16 interlinking for
> local functions 1
> 16 REGRESSIONS (1.05%).
>
>
While they are real regressions that have to be fixed, we don't have
MIPS16 binaries in Debian, so I am not sure this bug should be
considered as serious.
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurelien@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net
Reply to: