Re: mips* port plans for the squeeze cycle

To: debian-mips@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: mips* port plans for the squeeze cycle
From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 08:20:02 -1000
Message-id: <20090818182002.GB19413@deprecation.cyrius.com>
In-reply-to: <878whkgce4.fsf@pindar.marcbrockschmidt.de>
References: <878whkgce4.fsf@pindar.marcbrockschmidt.de>

* Marc Brockschmidt <marc@marcbrockschmidt.de> [2009-08-16 14:40]:
> Do you have any big changes planned? How much time would they take, and
> what consequences are there for the rest of the project?
> 
> How many "big" transitions will the upcoming changes cause? When should those
> happen? Can we do something to make them easier?

Do we have anything to say here?  I don't think there are any major
plans with regards to MIPS, are there?
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: mips* port plans for the squeeze cycle
  - From: Florian Lohoff <flo@rfc822.org>
- Re: mips* port plans for the squeeze cycle
  - From: Aurelien Jarno <aurelien@aurel32.net>

References:
- mips* port plans for the squeeze cycle
  - From: Marc Brockschmidt <marc@marcbrockschmidt.de>

Prev by Date: Help needed on mipsel #541706: gpe-expenses_0.1.7-2+b1(mipsel/unstable)
Next by Date: MIPS kernel snapshots - 2.6.31-rc6
Previous by thread: mips* port plans for the squeeze cycle
Next by thread: Re: mips* port plans for the squeeze cycle
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread