[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Status of fluidsynth on mipsel.


On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 06:28:58PM +0100, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 08:12:57PM +0100, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> > fluidsynth_1.0.3-5.1 was built successfully on mipsel several days ago
> > and is marked uploaded in wanna-build. I think I even happened to see the
> > package on incoming.d.o. However, it didn't make it to the archive. It
> > was built during the timeskew problems on remake, so maybe it got pulled
> > afterwards? Anyway, could you please re-upload the package or put it
> > back to needs-build, whatever is appropriate?
> Following up on myself, according to the mipsel build logs, fluidsynth
> has been successfully rebuilt by remake on Feb 13th, but has not been
> uploaded so far. Same for another couple of packages, mainly in section
> misc and sound. Friday, the 13th bug maybe? Can you please have a look
> and upload or rebuild? (And put muse as Dep-Wait on fluidsynth
> 1.0.3-5.1, which is the one I'm trying to get into sarge before the jack
> dependency chain strikes again.)

Sorry to keep pestering you with this issue, but something weird is
going on here. The latest fluidsynth version has now been built four
times on mipsel. The first build was screwed due to timestamp problems,
the other three build logs look fine to me. As already noted above, the
package never gets uploaded, though. This problem appears to be specific
to fluidsynth as the packages built directly before and after it on the
same buildd made it into the archive just fine.

Can you please tell Eric (maintainer) and me (uploader of this version)
whether the situation is likely to improve soon. This issue is keeping
fluidsynth and muse out of testing, and I wonder whether it's more
sensible to ask for removal of both packages and re-upload instead. 



Reply to: