[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

buildd admin must read [Was: Re: buildd rebuild request for conglomerate-0.7.8-1]



stappers@stappers.nl (Geert Stappers) writes:

> On Sun, Jan 18, 2004 at 01:42:52PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
> > Goswin von Brederlow <brederlo@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> writes:
> > > stappers@stappers.nl (Geert Stappers) writes:
> > > > [ where to request a rebuildd ]
> > > > 
> > > > So is here is my request for a rebuildd of conglomerate-0.7.8-1 on mipsel.
> > > > 
> > [ output of buildd attempt ]
> >  libgthread-2.0.so /usr/lib/libglade-2.0.so /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so /usr/lib/libxml2.so -lpthread -lz /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so /usr/lib/libatk-1.0.so /usr/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so -lm /usr/lib/libpangoxft-1.0.so /usr/lib/libpangox-1.0.so /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so /usr/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so -ldl /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so
> > E|2649.70|collect2: ld terminated with signal 9 [Killed]
> > E|2650.02|make[3]: *** [conglomerate] Error 1
> > O|2650.04|make[3]: Leaving directory `/root/build/conglomerate/conglomerate-0.7.8/src'
> > 
> > I only have 64 MB ram (no swap) so I guess thats totaly my hardwares
> > fault. Untill the harddisk arrives is a diskless system so your out of
> > luck. Sorry.
> 
> What does that mean for people without inside information about mipsel buildd?

That wasn't the buidd, just my own mipsel.

> From http://buildd.debian.org/stats/mipsel-all.txt I got:
> editors/conglomerate_0.7.8-1: Dep-Wait by rmurray-repeat [optional:out-of-date]
>   Dependencies: gcc-3.3 (>> 1:3.3.3ds0-0pre0)
>   Previous state was Building until 2003 Dec 23 03:03:00
> 
> There is a gcc-3.3 >> 1:3.3.3ds0-0pre0 available, but after 23-12-2003.
> Is it now not anymore in the buildd queue?

http://m68k.bluespice.org/cgi/package_status?mipsel_pkg=gcc-3.3&searchtype=go
|devel/gcc-3.3_1:3.3.3ds2-0pre2: Installed by rmurray-repeat [important:out-of-date]
|  Previous state was Uploaded until 2004 Jan 11 14:27:25

Conglomerate should be rebuild since its Dep-Wait is satisfied. My
mips is just to low on ram to do so. It realy should have been put
back into the queue quite some time ago.

Maybe something is wrong there. Keep prodding.

> How should I read http://buildd.debian.org/stats/?arch=mipsel&state=Dep-Wait ?
> That page contains:
> 
> admin/xfsdump_2.2.14-1: Dep-Wait by rmurray-repeat [optional:out-of-date]
>   Dependencies: libdm0-dev
>   Previous state was Building until 2003 Nov 12 01:17:26

libdm0-dev itself is in Dep-Wait for a newer glibc which isn't yet
available. That one still has to wait for its depends. It should be
build 3 days after a new glibc is done.

> x11/amule_1.2.4-1: Dep-Wait by rmurray-repeat [optional:out-of-date]
>   Dependencies: gcc-3.3 (>> 1:3.3.3ds0-0pre0)
>   Previous state was Building until 2003 Dec 23 03:02:46

Same as conglomerate, should be build from that info.

> editors/conglomerate_0.7.8-1: Dep-Wait by rmurray-repeat [optional:out-of-date]
>   Dependencies: gcc-3.3 (>> 1:3.3.3ds0-0pre0)
>   Previous state was Building until 2003 Dec 23 03:03:00
> 
> About xfsdump:
> Steve Langasek requested a requeue last night
> ( http://lists.debian.org/debian-mips/2004/debian-mips-200401/msg00022.html )
> 
> 
> I assume there are packages then conglomerate and xfsdump the need rebuildd.
> 
> Who tells more about it?

The mipsel buildd admin should know best.

By the way, dear mipsel buildd admin: Please send your buildd
information and email to Ingo Juergensmann <ingo@juergensmann.de> for
inclusion on

http://m68k.bluespice.org/index-mipsel.html

MfG
        Goswin



Reply to: