[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#223891: kdeutils_4:3.1.4-1(mips/unstable): FTBFS: SYS_* seems to be missing from bits/syscall.h ?



On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 09:40:53AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> At Tue, 13 Jan 2004 20:44:00 -0500,
> Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 10:07:18AM -0800, Ryan Murray wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 01:39:33AM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > > > However, bits/syscall.h should be provided by glibc - it should be
> > > > generated from arch/mips/unistd.h.  In kernel 2.6 mips guys introduces
> > > 
> > > Yes, it should.  drow has fixed it in his tree, and this fix should be in
> > > the next upload.
> > 
> > No, I've fixed it in my (MontaVista) tree and sent the patch to
> > debian-glibc.  Someone should figure out if it works on Debian's
> > version of glibc and kernel headers also, which is quite different from
> > the ones we're using at MV.
> 
> Where can I find your patch?  The current syscall.h is broken, so I
> think you're ok to put such patch into debian-glibc cvs, and we watch
> the result of buildd if no one is trying to look it.

X-Mailing-List: <debian-glibc@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/10962

http://lists.debian.org/debian-glibc/2004/debian-glibc-200401/msg00115.html

I'd be really grateful if you'd take care of that.  The other thing I
know needs to be done is to either add an environment variable to
enable the ld.so warning, or just disable it entirely - Jeff, if you
aren't going to have time for the former then let me know so I can do
the latter.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer



Reply to: