Re: kernel vs binutils
On Mon, 3 Sep 2001, Guido Guenther wrote:
> I did not try that yet. H.J. Lu told me that he is not seeing any
> problems with 126.96.36.199.29 and kernels for little endian boxes...
> Anyway I have attached a more complete patch against .29 (which also
> make the Oopses in si_swapinifo go away). I hope some binutils folks can
> provide some more input on that...
Try .31 as well. I realised that HJ wasn't applying the mips patches
directly, but rather was including them. I've changed my packaging
procedure to apply the patches starting in .31, so it just might work.