Re: kernel vs binutils
On Mon, 27 Aug 2001, Guido Guenther wrote:
> Missing in this case does not mean that these two should be there. It's
> just that the natively compiled elf image has these sections and the
> crossbuild one doesn't.
Ah, ok. There are some more mips patches going into binutils CVS,
so this may be solved already upstream. I'll see if I can set up a
cross-toolchain soon to test this out. If you have some time, try current
CVS and see if it's fixed.
> The crosstoolchain works(objdump -V prints 2.11.90). It's the native one
> that is broken(188.8.131.52.27). AFAIR 184.108.40.206 worked. I also updated
> gcc but his should not be related to the messed up section headers in
> the ecoff image.
Ok....good to know...