Re: GCC version?
On Sat, May 19, 2001 at 01:53:36PM -0700, Ryan Murray wrote:
> mips development on the 2.95.x branch of gcc is mostly dead, and I'm running
> into problems with the asm output of gcc not having valid syntax. Since there
> is active development with gcc 3.x, it seems like it might be best to change
> the default compiler for mips (and mipsel?) to gcc 3.x.
>
> Anyone have a compelling reason we shouldn't go to 3.x, since 2.95.x looks
> to be broken, and no one is looking at fixing it at this point?
I havent had a problem with gcc/binutils lately - I compiled
the debian packages a couple of days ago but didnt try to use them
as i didnt know anything on the state and the possible inclusion
of necessary patches.
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff flo@rfc822.org +49-5201-669912
Why is it called "common sense" when nobody seems to have any?
Reply to: