Re: Aha!
On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Pete Popov wrote:
> The mips3/4 cpus currently supported are supported in 32 bit mode; I've
> never tried the mip64 port myself ... and I'm not sure what the above
> mentioned concern is.
I've since found out that mips64 is still in progress and not quite "ready
for primetime", so I'll leave that issue behind for now.
> I think I just changed my mind about the mips ISA support :-) Currently,
> it appears that the Indys and Indigo2s are the "best" supported SGI
> systems. However, mips is much more than just SGI. There are many
> companies using mips cores for building SOCs, and mips32 is one of the
> popular cores. In the embedded market, mips has a very strong presence,
> and embedded linux is the future (please note that my opinion is highly
> biased in that regard). So, I think it would be great to bring the
> toolchain up to date, including mips 1/2 support. There is some very cool
> mips hardware coming down the pipeline and, as I said, having an up to
> date mips isa 1 and 2 (as well as 3 and 4) support would be great.
Good point. I was wondering what the market was for MIPS outside of
SGI. I knew there were other computers based on MIPS processors, but
wasn't sure about the embedded market and what iterations of mips
processors that they used.
> I think so. It has an entire chapter on "Complete Guide to the MIPS
> Instruction Set", plus a chapter on assembler programming, an other
> chapter on c mips programming, etc. It brings the entire mips history
> and architecture together in one book and covers pretty much everything
> (including the caches, tlbs, floating point, etc). You might still want
> to get the mips ISA specs from MIPS, but definitely do get this book.
Sounds like a must-buy :-) I'll look into it shortly then. Thanks for
the info!
> Sorry for uneducated question, but you seem to be involved heavily in
> gcc/binutils?
Yes and no. I'm currently the binutils maintainer for Debian and also the
de-facto port leader for Debian-Alpha, so dealing with the toolchain is a
frequent exercise for me. A couple of us are also porting HURD over to
Alpha, so it's become even more of a task lately :-) I try to keep my
input on binutils and gcc at a minimum (since many of the active
binutils/gcc developers know far more than I ever will), but I do assert
myself from time to time.
C
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: Aha!
- From: Pete Popov <ppopov@pacbell.net>