[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1109238: RFS: prismlauncher/9.4+ds-1 [ITP] -- FOSS Minecraft launcher supporting multiple instances and accounts



Control: tags -1 +confirmed

I am not a Debian Developer (DD) (and can never be) and have no ability to
upload your package, sorry. This review is for your information with no
requirement to act upon it.

Ben,

Review of upload: 2025-08-11 21:27

Test 1 (reproducibility): Information only, not a blocker

dpkg-deb: construction du paquet « prismlauncher-dbgsym » dans
« ../prismlauncher-dbgsym_9.4+ds-1_amd64.deb ».
dpkg-deb: construction du paquet « prismlauncher » dans
« ../prismlauncher_9.4+ds-1_amd64.deb ».
 dpkg-genbuildinfo --build=binary -O../prismlauncher_9.4+ds-1_amd64.buildinfo
 dpkg-genchanges --build=binary -O../prismlauncher_9.4+ds-1_amd64.changes
dpkg-genchanges: info: binary-only upload (no source code included)
 dpkg-source --after-build .
dpkg-buildpackage: info: binary-only upload (no source included)
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/reprotest/__init__.py", line 862, in run
    return 0 if check_func(*check_args) else 1
                ~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/reprotest/__init__.py", line 417, in
check_auto
    if is_reproducible("1", var_x1):
       ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/reprotest/__init__.py", line 411, in
<lambda>
    is_reproducible = lambda name, var: test_args.check_reproducible(proc,
dist_x0, name, var)
                                       
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/reprotest/__init__.py", line 353, in
check_reproducible
    raise RuntimeError("diffoscope exited non-boolean %s, can't continue" %
retcode)
RuntimeError: diffoscope exited non-boolean -9, can't continue

Test 2 (pbuilder build): Information only

* Good

Test 3 (pbuilder build --twice): Information only

* Good

Test 4 (sbuild): Information only

* Good

Test 5 (ratt): Information only, not a blocker

Note: Possible false positives.

* Good

Test 6 (debian/watch): Information only

* Good

Test 7 (licenserecon): Information only

* Good

Summary
=======

Looks good here.

Tagging as 'confirmed'.

Test 1:

This maybe an issue with the package or other. You may wish to look at this in
the future if reprotest fails when uploaded.

Tags
====

If a 'moreinfo' tag has been added to your RFS bug. You can remove the tag using
the line below at the top of a reply that is supplying information and/or
indicating a new upload.

Control: tags -1 -moreinfo

Regards

Phil

-- 

Blog: https://blog.kathenas.org

Buy me a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg

GPG Fingerprint: 70A0 AC45 AC77 9EFE 84F6 3AED 724A A9B5 2F02 4C8B

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: