[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1110502: RFS: fvs/0.3.4-1 [ITP] -- File Versioning System



Control: tags -1 +confirmed

I am not a Debian Developer (DD) and have no ability to upload your package -
Sorry. All reviews are for your and any interested DD's information. There is no
requirement by any party to act upon my reviews, but I do hope it helps.

Seyed,

Review of upload: 2025-08-07 05:12

Test 1 (reproducibility): Information only, not a blocker

* Good

Test 2 (pbuilder build): Information only

* Good

Test 3 (pbuilder build --twice): Information only

* Good

Test 4 (sbuild): Information only

* Good

Test 5 (ratt): Information only, not a blocker

Note: Possible false positives.

* Good

Test 6 (debian/watch): Information only

* Good

Test 7 (licenserecon): Information only

* Good

philwyett@ks-tarkin:~/build/fvs-0.3.4$ lrc
en: Versions: licenserecon '6.0'  licensecheck '3.3.9-1'

Parsing Source Tree  ....
Reading d/copyright  ....
Running licensecheck ....

d/copyright      | licensecheck

MIT              | Expat             LICENSE
MIT              | Expat             setup.cfg

You may want to add the two files to 'debian/lrc.config' to hide them from 'lrc'
runs.

Summary
=======

Looks good here.

Tagging as 'confirmed'.

Note: You can remove 'Rules-Requires-Root: no' as it is now the default and no
longer need be added to 'debian/control'.

Note: A manual page for the package would be a great addition.

I like informational and educational packages like these. Thank you for creating
it.

Tags
====

If a 'moreinfo' tag has been added to your RFS bug. You can remove the tag using
the line below at the top of a reply that is supplying information and/or
indicating a new upload.

Control: tags -1 -moreinfo

Regards

Phil

-- 

Blog: https://blog.kathenas.org

Buy me a coffee: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg

GPG Fingerprint: 70A0 AC45 AC77 9EFE 84F6 3AED 724A A9B5 2F02 4C8B

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: