[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1110322: RFS: dl-distro/2.4.3-1 [ITP] -- Bash script for downloading and verifying OS images



X-Debbugs-CC: modaresisofthard@proton.me

Hi,

On Sun, 03 Aug 2025 09:59:48 +0000 Seyed Mohamad Amin Modaresi <modaresisofthard@proton.me> wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
> 
> Dear mentors,
> 
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "dl-distro":
> 
>  * Package name     : dl-distro
>    Version          : 2.4.3-1
>    Upstream contact : bashuser30 <bashuser30@mailbox.org>
>  * URL              : https://codeberg.org/bashuser30/dl-distro
>  * License          : GPL-3+
>  * Vcs              : https://salsa.debian.org/amin_modaresi/dl-distro
>    Section          : utils
> 
> The source builds the following binary packages:
> 
>   dl-distro - Bash script for downloading and verifying OS images
> 
> To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:
> 
>   https://mentors.debian.net/package/dl-distro/
> 
> Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:
> 
>   dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/dl-distro/dl-distro_2.4.3-1.dsc
> 
> Changes for the initial release:
> 
>  dl-distro (2.4.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium
>  .
>    * initial packaging. (Closes: #1110008)
> 
> Regards,

I have question regarding licenses.

https://salsa.debian.org/amin_modaresi/dl-distro/-/blob/21a92215bfb9c0d1f2587df0337731cb4a215fbe/debian/copyright#L10
mentions that all files are licensed under GPL-3.0-or-later. However,
https://salsa.debian.org/amin_modaresi/dl-distro/-/blob/21a92215bfb9c0d1f2587df0337731cb4a215fbe/README.md?plain=1#L166
mentions that all files are licensed under GPL-3.0 only. The
https://salsa.debian.org/amin_modaresi/dl-distro/-/blob/21a92215bfb9c0d1f2587df0337731cb4a215fbe/dl-distro#L10
file mentions that the license is GPL-3.0-or-later. Which one is true?
Can you confirm with upstream? Please work with upstream to clarify
or unify the licensing condition.

Thanks,
Boyuan Yang

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: