[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#1104564: RFS: fonts-libertinus/7.051-1 [ITP] -- High-quality open-source typefaces for academic and scientific use



On Friday, May 16, 2025 8:41:29 AM Mountain Standard Time Abhishek Deshpande 
wrote:
> Hello Phil,
> 
> For Test 4, I'll fix the whitespaces.
> 
> > Test 7. Can we have a review of 'debian/copyright'? No changes, possible
> 
> changes
> 
> > or adding to a 'debian/lrc.config' file.
> 
> To be frank, I did not get this Test 7 point. Could you please guide me?
> 
> Being a newbie in Debian packaging, I found it easy to copy precompiled
> fonts directly,
> instead of running the whole build process. If it's strictly necessary to
> build them, I will
> learn more about it and tweak the necessary files and re-upload the package.

Yes, you are supposed to build them.  That hasn’t always been done in the 
past, but there is an effort to get there with all the existing packages.

If you happen to be building a font under the OFL license with a reserved 
name, you probably have to build the font (to prove that it can be done) but 
then distribute the upstream precompiled fonts to comply with the license.

https://salsa.debian.org/fonts-team/fonts-adobe-sourcesans3/-/blob/master/
debian/README.Source?ref_type=heads

You an read a little more about why this is needed in point 5.9 of the FAQ:

https://openfontlicense.org/ofl-reserved-font-names/

In all other circumstances of which I am aware, you should only ship the fonts 
that are built from source during the package build.

-- 
Soren Stoutner
soren@debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: