[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1101104: RFS: adwaita-fonts/48.2-1 [ITP] -- Adwaita Fonts Collection



Hi, Jeremy.
Thanks for the renaming tip. I renamed the package to fonts-adwaita

Salsa: https://salsa.debian.org/krekhov/fonts-adwaita
Mentors: https://mentors.debian.net/package/fonts-adwaita/

---
Regards, Kirill Rekhov

GPG Fingerprint:
2640 769D FDA1 AAA0 F863  D1AE 5F2C 5905 519C E0A0

вс, 30 мар. 2025 г. в 00:04, Jeremy Bícha <jeremy.bicha@canonical.com>:
According to team policy [1], I request that the source package be
renamed to fonts-adwaita even though that is different from how GNOME
names it. (This is similar to what we did with
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/cantarell-fonts )

Personally, I don't think that a metapackage is needed that depends on
both font packages, but if you are going to use one, it should also be
named fonts-adwaita.

[1] https://wiki.debian.org/Fonts/PackagingPolicy

Thank you,
Jeremy Bícha
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=vqV+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply to: