[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1100014: RFS: pixz/1.0.7-4 [RC] -- parallel, indexing XZ compressor/decompressor



On Wed, 2025-03-12 at 12:51 +0100, Salvo Tomaselli wrote:
> The dsc file seems gone
> 
> curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 404
> 
> Il giorno lun 10 mar 2025 alle ore 11:49 Leon Marz <main@lmarz.org> ha
> scritto:
> > 
> > Package: sponsorship-requests
> > Severity: important
> > 
> > Dear mentors,
> > 
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "pixz":
> > 
> > * Package name : pixz
> > Version : 1.0.7-4
> > Upstream contact : Dave Vasilevsky <dave@vasilevsky.ca>
> > * URL : https://github.com/vasi/pixz
> > * License : BSD-2-Clause
> > * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/pixz
> > Section : utils
> > 
> > The source builds the following binary packages:
> > 
> > pixz - parallel, indexing XZ compressor/decompressor
> > 
> > To access further information about this package, please visit the
> > following URL:
> > 
> > https://mentors.debian.net/package/pixz/
> > 
> > Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:
> > 
> > dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/pixz/pixz_1.0.7-4.dsc
> > 
> > Changes since the last upload:
> > 
> > pixz (1.0.7-4) unstable; urgency=medium
> > .
> > * d/patches: Add oom-safety.patch (Closes: #1099263)
> > * d/copyright: Update copyright year to 2025
> > * Update Standards-Version to 4.7.2, no changes needed
> > - Leon
> 
> 
> 

Hi,

Was uploaded earlier.

[2025-03-12] Accepted pixz 1.0.7-4 (source) into unstable (Leon Marz) (signed
by: Jeroen Ploemen)

Regards

Phil

-- 

Regards

Phil

Donate: https://buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg

--

"I play the game for the game’s own sake"

Arthur Conan Doyle - The Adventure of the Bruce-Partington Plans

--

Internet Relay Chat (IRC): kathenas

Website: https://kathenas.org

Instagram: https://instagram.com/kathenasorg

Threads: https://www.threads.net/@kathenasorg

--




Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: