Hi Maytham, On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 01:58:16PM +0800, Maytham Alsudany wrote: > Before I go ahead and upload, have you considered fixing this: > > I: libwtmpdb0: no-symbols-control-file usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libwtmpdb.so.0.71.0 > N: > N: Although the package includes a shared library, the package does not have > N: a symbols control file. > N: > N: dpkg can use symbols files in order to generate more accurate library > N: dependencies for applications, based on the symbols from the library that > N: are actually used by the application. > N: > N: Please refer to the dpkg-gensymbols(1) manual page and > N: https://wiki.debian.org/UsingSymbolsFiles for details. > N: > N: Visibility: info > N: Show-Always: no > N: Check: debian/shlibs That is a good question! I did intend to do so at leisure as it was my understanding that doing this would only weaken not strengthen dependencies and therefore 'fail safe' when not present and would not be a regression. But this is a new upstream version with ABI changes so maybe this is more important than with my previous QA uploads and now is the time to do it! There are no other packages in Debian depending on this library so I will want to create a local test application and package to verify behaviour. Andrew
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature