Bug#1067038: RFS: notifymuch/0.1~git20151223.0.9d4aaf5-1 -- Display desktop notifications for unread mail in notmuch database
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo
On Fri, 2025-02-14 at 12:44 +0100, itd wrote:
> Control: tags -1 - moreinfo
>
> Hi,
>
> Phil Wyett <philip.wyett@kathenas.org> writes:
>
> > Thank you for taking the time to prepare this package and your ongoing
> > contribution to the Debian project.
>
> and thank you once more for the review and feedback.
>
> > Test 8 Fail Summary
> > ===================
> >
> > philwyett@ks-calrissian:~/Downloads$ notifymuch
> > philwyett@ks-calrissian:~/Downloads$ Traceback (most recent call last):
> > File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/notifymuch/notification.py", line
> > 52, in
> > on_activate
> > messages = Messages()
> > File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/notifymuch/messages.py", line 122,
> > in
> > __init__
> > db = notmuch.Database()
> > File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/notmuch/database.py", line 160, in
> > __init__
> > Database._std_db_path = self._get_user_default_db()
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^^
> > File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/notmuch/database.py", line 674, in
> > _get_user_default_db
> > config.readfp(codecs.open(conf_f, 'r', 'utf-8'))
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > File "<frozen codecs>", line 921, in open
> > FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory:
> > '/home/philwyett/.notmuch-config'
>
> I am assuming that the test is considered a failure since the program
> terminated with an exception. Was notmuch configured on that machine?
> If not, then I would consider this outcome not a failure (even though a
> nicely formatted error message might be more appealing).
>
> The package now Enhances/Recommends notmuch, contains a brief manpage,
> and ships upstream's README.rst with expected first steps. None of this
> will ensure that users configure notmuch first, but it might help them
> figure out how to use this software.
>
> Best regards
> itd
Hi itd,
Does this package require 'notmuch'? If so, is it a 'Depends' or 'Suggests'
Reply to: