Bug#979188: RFS: git-subrepo/0.4.9-3 -- Alternative to git-submodule(1) and git-subtree(1)

[Samo Pogačnik <samo_pogacnik@t-2.net>]

Hi Bo,

On Thu, 2025-02-13 at 07:24 +0800, Bo YU wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2025 at 07:57:14PM +0100, Samo Pogačnik wrote:
> > Package: sponsorship-requests
> > Severity: normal
> > Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
> > 
> > Dear mentors,
> > 
> > I am looking for a sponsor for my package "git-subrepo":
> > 
> > * Package name     : git-subrepo
> >   Version          : 0.4.9-3
> >   Upstream contact : Ingy döt Net <ingy@ingy.net>
> > * URL              : https://github.com/ingydotnet/git-subrepo
> > * License          : GPL-2+ and GPL-2, MIT
> > * Vcs              : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/git-subrepo
> >   Section          : vcs
> > 
> > The source builds the following binary packages:
> > 
> >  git-subrepo - Alternative to git-submodule(1) and git-subtree(1)
> > 
> > To access further information about this package, please visit the following
> > URL:
> > 
> >  https://mentors.debian.net/package/git-subrepo/
> > 
> > Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:
> > 
> >  dget -x
> > https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/git-subrepo/git-subrepo_0.4.9-3.dsc
> > 
> > Changes since the last upload:
> > 
> > git-subrepo (0.4.9-3) unstable; urgency=medium
> > .
> >   * d/control: update Standards-Version to 4.7.0
> >   * d/control: bump debhelper compat level to 13
> >   * d/control: added Multi-Arch: same
> 
> Thanks for working on this.
> 

Thank you very much for the reply and for being willing to sponsor this package.

>  From the tracker page[0], there is only 0.4.9-1 in Debian archive, so I
> suppose you should merge 0.4.9-3 and 0.4.9-2 to 0.4.9-2.
> 
> Once the ITP was addressed, the another RFS should be opened with new one
> reportbug, is there something I am missing? 
> 

I've initially opened a new RFS[1] while proposing 0.4.9-2. Then i've been
instructed to use existing RFS and to make some additional changes, so i ended
up with 0.4.9-3 using old RFS.

So, now i am a bit confused about how to proceed and what would be the correct
way to merge 0.4.9-3 and 0.4.9-2 to 0.4.9-2 in git/salsa (may i force push or
not, may d/changelog for the same version change in git history - i suppose
until not  tagged?), if that would be way to go?

best regards, Samo

[1]: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1092712


> Anyway, please ping me when get ready to sponsor.
> 
> BR,
> Bo
> 
> [0]: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/git-subrepo
>