On Thu, 2 Jan 2025 03:36:59 +0900 yokota <yokota.hgml@gmail.com> wrote: > I fixed the issues and updated salsa. Thank you for the update, the added comment in d/copyright is very informative. Funny how that notice was hiding in plain sight yet so hard to spot. Anyway, that leaves just one issue: the upstream copyright statement embedded in src/logo.s lacks an explicit license grant detailing what specific versions of the GPL apply. Now they do include a copy of the GPL-2 and I don't doubt releasing their code under that license is intended, but even assuming for a moment that's sufficient proof for the FTP Masters (for GPL-2 only), it still leaves the "or any later version" part of the current d/copyright unsubstantiated. Is there any statement from upstream about what specific version or versions of the GPL they want to apply to their code?
Attachment:
pgpYYrG8YL5Tm.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature