Re: Bug#1080299: RFS: dia/0.98+git20240814-1 -- Diagram editor
On Tue, 3 Sep 2024 23:05:03 +0200,
Andreas Ronnquist<mailinglists@gusnan.se> wrote:
>On Tue, 3 Sep 2024 22:57:32 +0200,
>Philippe SWARTVAGHER<phil.swart@gmx.fr> wrote:
>
>>Hello,
>>
>>Le 03/09/2024 à 08:28, Phil Wyett a écrit :
>>>> Hey - I'll sponsor this, but i would like to see something more
>>>> descriptive for the closing of the bug in the changelog:
>>>>
>>>>> Changes since the last upload:
>>>>>
>>>>> dia (0.98+git20240814-1) unstable; urgency=medium
>>>>> .
>>>>> * New upstream snapshot
>>>>> - Closes: #1078335
>>>>> * Remove patches applied upstream
>>>>> * Build-depend on libemf-dev only on available architectures
>>>>>
>>>> perhaps something like
>>>>
>>>>> * New upstream snapshot
>>>>> - Fix adding images to diagrams - Closes: #1078335
>>>>> * Remove patches applied upstream
>>>>> * Build-depend on libemf-dev only on available architectures
>>
>>Done.
>>
>>
>>
>>> Could the below files be appropriately handled in 'debian/copyright'
>>>
>>> philwyett@ks-tarkin:~/Development/builder/debian/mentoring/dia-
>>> 0.98+git20240814$ lrc
>>> : Versions: recon 1.16 check 3.3.9-1
>>>
>>> Parsing Source Tree ....
>>> Reading copyright ....
>>> Running licensecheck ....
>>>
>>> d/copyright | licensecheck
>>>
>>> GPL-2 | public-domain plug-ins/layout/ogdf-simple.cpp
>>> GPL-2 | public-domain plug-ins/layout/ogdf-simple.h
>>
>>Done.
>>
>>> GPL-2 | MIT~Xfig plug-ins/xfig/fig-format-3.2
>>
>>This one seems like a false-positive: the copyright of this file is not
>>clear, but I cannot find any mention about "MIT-Xfig" in this file or
>>even in the whole project.
>>
>>I uploaded to mentors the updated package:
>>https://mentors.debian.net/package/dia/.
>>
>>Thanks for your reviews,
>>
>
>Thank you! I'll get it uploaded tonight (shortly).
>
Uploaded!
I changed the UNRELEASED in d/changelog to unstable, so you'll have to take care
of this in the git repository too.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian!
-- Andreas Rönnquist
mailinglists@gusnan.se
andreas@ronnquist.net
Reply to: