[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#1076395: RFS: astro/0.25.1-1 [ITP] -- Gemini web browser using shell script



Akash,


I have sponsored astro.  As Phill said, this package is in excellent shape.


I noticed that upstream uses the Expat (MIT) license, but that you chose to license debian/* as GPL-2+.  It is generally considered good practice to use the same license for debian/* as upstream, so that any patches or other information in debian/* can be submitted upstream if it ever makes sense to do so.  This is not a hard requirement and you are certainly free to license debian/* under the GPL-2+ if you feel strongly it should be so.  But you might consider changing the license to Expat in a future release.


Based on the quality of your packaging, I would recommend you consider becoming a Debian Maintainer.


https://wiki.debian.org/DebianMaintainer


Soren


On Wednesday, July 17, 2024 11:09:22 AM MST Akash Doppalapudi wrote:

> Thank you Soren and Phil for reviewing this package.

>

> --

> Akash Doppalapudi

>

> On 7/17/24 11:22 PM, Soren Stoutner wrote:

>

> > Akash,

> >

> >

> >

> > I will review your package for sponsorship.

> >

> >

> >

> > On Tuesday, July 16, 2024 7:09:36 PM MST Phil Wyett wrote:

> >

> >> Akash,

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >> Preamble...

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >> Thank you for taking the time to create this package and your contribution

> >> to the Debian project.

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >> The review below is for assistance. This review is offered to help

> >> package submitters to Debian mentors inorder to improve their packages

> >> prior to possible sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on

> >> behalf

> >> of the submitter to make any alterations based upon information provided

> >> in the review.

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >> Review...

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >> 1. Build[1]: Good

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >> 2. Lintian[2]: Good

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >> 3. Licenses (lrc[3]): Good

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >> 4. Watch file (uscan --force-download): Good

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >> 5. Build Twice (sudo pbuilder build --twice <package>.dsc): Good

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >> 6. Reproducible builds (reporotest)[3]: Good

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >> 7. Install (No previous installs): Good

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >> 8. Upgrade (Over previous installs if any): N/A

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >> Summary...

> >>

> >>

> >>

> >> This is an initial submission of a very high quality - Excellent work

> >> Akash=

> >

> >



--

Soren Stoutner

soren@debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: