[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1074592: RFS: selint/1.5.0-2 -- Static code analysis of refpolicy style SELinux policies



On Sat, 6 Jul 2024 at 21:33, Pierre Gruet <pgt@debian.org> wrote:
>
> Hello Christian,
>
> On Wed, 03 Jul 2024 17:04:44 +0100 Phil Wyett
> <philip.wyett@kathenas.org> wrote:
>  > Hi Christian,
>  >
>  > Preamble...
>  >
>  > Thanks for taking time to create this package and your contribution
> to Debian.
>  >
>  > The below review is for assistance. It is offered to help submitters of
>  > packages to Debian mentors improve their packages prior to possible
>  > sponsorship into Debian. There is no obligation on behalf of the
> subitter to
>  > make any alterations based upon information provided in the review.
>  >
>  > Review...
>  >
>  > 1. Build: Good
>  >
>  > 2. Lintian: Good
>  >
>  > 3. Licenses: Issue
>  >
>  >
> philwyett@ks-windu:~/Development/builder/debian/mentoring/selint-1.5.0$ lrc
>  > en: Versions: recon 1.11 check 3.3.9-1
>  >
>  > Parsing Source Tree ....
>  > Reading copyright ....
>  > Running licensecheck ....
>  >
>  > d/copyright | licensecheck
>  >
>  > Apache-2.0 | FSFAP INSTALL
>  >
>  > It would be nice if this minor issue could be fixed in this upload.
>  >
>  > 4. Build Twice (sudo pbuilder build --twice <package>.dsc): Good
>  >
>  > 5. Reproducible builds (reporotest)[1]: Good
>  >
>  > 6. Install (No previous installs): Good
>  >
>  > 7. Upgrade (Over previous installs if any): Good
>  >
>  > [1] https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/Howto#Newer_method
>  >
>  > Summary...
>  >
>  > Excluding the one minor issue, I believe selint is ready for
> sponsorship/upload. Could a Debian
>  > Developer (DD) with available free time, please review this package
> and upload if you feel it is
>  > ready.

Thanks for your review Phil.
I wasn't aware of licenserecon, I try to add it to my packaging routine.

(Could you please include nnn-submitter@bugs.debian.org in the
recipient list, otherwise the bug submitters won't get notified.)

>
> Nothing more to say. I also reviewed the packaging and my only remark is
> also on the copyright: can you please acknowledge in d/copyright that
> INSTALL is under FSFAP with copyright owned by the FSF?

Added a new commit and uploaded to mentors.

> After that, just tell me and I can upload the package for you.
>
> Also a side note: in general it is better not to tag the commit until
> the package is really uploaded, especially if you are asking for
> sponsorship, as some changes may be suggested afterwards as is the case
> here.

Thanks, will try to do; removed the tag for now,

>
> Thanks for all the work!
>
> And thanks to Phil also for the first review :)
>
> Best,
>
> --
> Pierre


Reply to: