Bug#1073027: RFS: parlatype/4.2-1 -- Minimal audio player for manual speech transcription
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "parlatype":
* Package name : parlatype
Version : 4.2-1
Upstream contact : that's actually me
* URL : www.parlatype.xyz
* License : GPL-3+
* Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/gkarsay/parlatype
Section : sound
The source builds the following binary packages:
parlatype - Minimal audio player for manual speech transcription
parlatype-common - Minimal audio player for manual speech
transcription (arch-independent files)
libparlatype7 - Library for Parlatype - runtime version
libparlatype-dev - Library for Parlatype - development version
libparlatype-doc - Documentation files for the Parlatype library
gir1.2-parlatype-5.0 - Library for Parlatype - gir bindings
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/parlatype/
Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:
dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/p/parlatype/parlatype_4.2-1.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
parlatype (4.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* New upstream version 4.2
* Update watch file
* Refresh patch #02
* Add patch for autopkgtest
* Remove glade option and copyright of its assets
* Update copyright for added/removed files
* Update homepage to www.parlatype.xyz
* Change app ID to xyz.parlatype.Parlatype (install)
* Raise GTK dependency from 3 to 4
* Update gir package to 5.0
* Update lib package to libparlatype7
* Move arch-independent files into package parlatype-common
* Enable cross-compiling GObject introspection data
* Bump Standards-Version to 4.7.0 (no changes needed)
* Lintian override for gir (false positive)
Other info:
* Although I intended to fix cross compiling, the Salsa CI cross compile
test didn't succeed.
* According to mentors' QA information there's an unused override. I had
that lintian warning locally and as described in the override I think
it's a false positive.
Regards,
Gabor Karsay
Reply to: