[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1072258: RFS: opam/2.1.6+dfsg-1 [RC] [Team] -- package manager for OCaml



On Sat, Jun 1, 2024 at 12:05 AM Gianfranco Costamagna
<locutusofborg@debian.org> wrote:
>
> pipeline failed again :/
>

No worried. Only it passes the extract-source phrase. The pipeline was
failed also in the past.

BR,
Bo
>
>
>
>
>
> Il venerdì 31 maggio 2024 alle ore 16:57:24 CEST, Bo YU <tsu.yubo@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 10:41 PM Gianfranco Costamagna
> <locutusofborg@debian.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hello, I downloaded both
> > https://github.com/ocaml/opam/releases/download/2.1.6/opam-full-2.1.6.tar.gz
> > and
> > https://github.com/ocaml/opam/archive/refs/tags/2.1.6.tar.gz
> >
> > ls -l 1/opam-full-2.1.6/appveyor_build.cmd 2/opam-2.1.6/appveyor_build.cmd
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 locutus locutus 10160 mag 16 14:02 1/opam-full-2.1.6/appveyor_build.cmd
> > -rw-rw-r-- 1 locutus locutus 10160 mag 16 12:28 2/opam-2.1.6/appveyor_build.cmd
> >
> > So,
> >
> > to me looks like we can commit on master the bits changes, and then import the new version without dfsg and forget about this issue?
> >
> > https://salsa.debian.org/ocaml-team/opam/-/merge_requests/10
> >
> > Looks working for me, if you are ok, I can do, otherwise feel free to cherry-pick from my branch!
>
> Okay, this looks good to me. Please commit on master first and then I
> will do a team upload with a new upstream release.
> Thanks.
>
> BR,
> Bo
>
> >
> > G.
>


Reply to: