Re: Packaging an application with unpackaged dependencies

To: Wookey <wookey@wookware.org>
Cc: debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Packaging an application with unpackaged dependencies
From: David Given <dg@cowlark.com>
Date: Sun, 26 May 2024 23:31:25 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] CALgV52iwz9ek=38zXXpd2-5mG9v5TEmm7bbGM9XKq7o9mMPFPw@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20240526025822.GB19042@mail.wookware.org>
References: <[🔎] CALgV52j_6HB6oR8+zvjGKXwSZUR4ULqskR8GcZQUt=O8EC657A@mail.gmail.com> <[🔎] 20240526025822.GB19042@mail.wookware.org>

On Sun, 26 May 2024 at 04:58, Wookey <wookey@wookware.org> wrote:

On 2024-05-24 16:39 +0200, David Given wrote:

[...]

> - package up the dependency and get it sponsored first... meaning that I'll
> be trying to get a library added which has no users.

This is what I do. All packages have no users before they enter the
archive so that's not really a problem.

Cool. I'll continue trying to make it build and come up with a full list of unpackaged dependencies, and report back.

Reply to:

References:
- Packaging an application with unpackaged dependencies
  - From: David Given <dg@cowlark.com>
- Re: Packaging an application with unpackaged dependencies
  - From: Wookey <wookey@wookware.org>

Prev by Date: Re: Packaging an application with unpackaged dependencies
Next by Date: Bug#1071755: RFS: open62541/1.4.1-1 [ITP] -- open62541 (<http://open62541.org>) is an open source implementation
Previous by thread: Re: Packaging an application with unpackaged dependencies
Next by thread: Bug#1071755: RFS: open62541/1.4.1-1 [ITP] -- open62541 (<http://open62541.org>) is an open source implementation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread