Bug#1070991: RFS: libcdio-paranoia/10.2+2.0.2-1 -- audio CD reading utility which includes extra data verification features
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "libcdio-paranoia":
* Package name : libcdio-paranoia
Version : 10.2+2.0.2-1
Upstream contact : [fill in name and email of upstream]
* URL : https://www.gnu.org/software/libcdio/
* License : [fill in]
* Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/debian/libcdio-paranoia
Section : libs
The source builds the following binary packages:
libcdio-cdda-dev - library to read and control digital audio CDs
(development files)
libcdio-cdda2t64 - library to read and control digital audio CDs
libcdio-paranoia-dev - library to read digital audio CDs with error
correction (development files)
libcdio-paranoia2t64 - library to read digital audio CDs with error
correction
cd-paranoia - audio CD reading utility which includes extra data
verification features
To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/libcdio-paranoia/
Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:
dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/libc/libcdio-paranoia/libcdio-paranoia_10.2+2.0.2-1.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
libcdio-paranoia (10.2+2.0.2-1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
[ Debian Janitor ]
* Remove constraints unnecessary since buster (oldstable):
+ Build-Depends: Drop versioned constraint on libcdio-dev.
+ libcdio-cdda-dev: Drop versioned constraint on libcdio-dev in
Depends.
+ libcdio-paranoia-dev: Drop versioned constraint on libcdio-dev
in Depends.
+ cd-paranoia: Drop versioned constraint on libcdio-utils in Replaces.
+ cd-paranoia: Drop versioned constraint on libcdio-utils in Breaks.
.
[ Philippe SWARTVAGHER ]
* d/control: update Build-Depends packages, as suggested by Lintian
* New upstream release
- Drop all patches (applied upstream).
- Closes: #981017.
* Bump Standards-Version to 4.7.0 (no change)
* Add patches to fix typos
Regards,
--
Philippe
Reply to: