Bug#1067253: RFS: obconf/1:2.0.4+git20150213-3 [RC] -- preferences manager for Openbox window manager
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: important
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package "obconf":
* Package name : obconf
Version : 1:2.0.4+git20150213-3
Upstream contact : openbox@icculus.org
* URL : https://github.com/danakj/obconf
* License : GPL-2+
* Vcs : https://github.com/mati75/obconf-debian.git
Section : x11
The source builds the following binary packages:
obconf - preferences manager for Openbox window manager
To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:
https://mentors.debian.net/package/obconf/
Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:
dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/obconf/obconf_2.0.4+git20150213-3.dsc
Changes since the last upload:
obconf (1:2.0.4+git20150213-3) unstable; urgency=medium
.
[ Debian Janitor ]
* Trim trailing whitespace.
* Use secure copyright file specification URI.
* Update renamed lintian tag names in lintian overrides.
* Set upstream metadata fields: Repository, Repository-Browse.
* Fix day-of-week for changelog entry 2.0.1-1.
* Remove constraints unnecessary since stretch:
+ Build-Depends: Drop versioned constraint on debhelper.
* Bump debhelper dependency to >= 10, since that's what is used in
debian/compat.
* Remove constraints unnecessary since buster:
+ Build-Depends: Drop versioned constraint on openbox-dev.
.
[ Pino Toscano ]
* Stop shipping the old KDE desktop MIME types, as they are no more needed
now. (Closes: #875517)
.
[ Mateusz Łukasik ]
* Add patch from Gentoo for fix FTBFS with the compiler flag
-Werror=implicit-function-declaration. (Closes: #1066381)
* Bump Standards-Version to 4.6.2.
* Bump d/watch to 4 version.
* Convert sources to dh 13.
* Add d/clean for fix Fails to build source after successful build.
(Closes: #1048752)
* Add Rules-Requires-Root to d/control.
* Rename overrides in d/source/lintian-overrides.
* Update year in d/copyright.
Regards,
--
Mateusz Łukasik
Reply to: