Bug#1060038: RFS: gtklock-userinfo-module/2.1.0-1 [ITP] -- user info module for gtklock
On Fri, 05 Jan 2024 12:13:29 +0800 Maytham Alsudany
<maytha8thedev@gmail.com> wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
> X-Debbugs-Cc: werdahias@riseup.net
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "gtklock-userinfo-module":
>
> * Package name : gtklock-userinfo-module
> Version : 2.1.0-1
> Upstream contact :
https://github.com/jovanlanik/gtklock-userinfo-module/issues
> * URL :
https://github.com/jovanlanik/gtklock-userinfo-module
> * License : GPL-3+
> * Vcs :
https://salsa.debian.org/Maytha8/gtklock-userinfo-module
> Section : misc
>
> The source builds the following binary packages:
>
> gtklock-userinfo-module - user info module for gtklock
>
> To access further information about this package, please visit the
following URL:
>
> https://mentors.debian.net/package/gtklock-userinfo-module/
>
> Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this
command:
>
> dget -x
https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/g/gtklock-userinfo-module/gtklock-userinfo-module_2.1.0-1.dsc
>
> Changes for the initial release:
>
> gtklock-userinfo-module (2.1.0-1) unstable; urgency=medium
> .
> * Initial release. (Closes: #1059901)
>
> Kind regards,
> Maytham
Hi Maytham,
looks good so far.
Two minor nitpicks I spotted: The build dependency on pkg-config should
be changed to pkgconf as that package was renamed some time ago. Also,
the Section: in d/control should be x11 since it is display-server related.
Furthermore, as the upstream readme states, the dependency on gtklock
should probably be versioned like this in d/control: gtklock (>=
${binary:Version}), ( see Debian policy § 7.1).
Personal recommendation: look into setting up you repo DEP-14 style (and
possible under the debian/ umbrella) as this will make maintaining in
the long run easier imho.
best,
werdahias
Reply to: