Bug#1062683: RFS: runit-services/0.7.1 -- UNIX init scheme with service supervision (services)
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Lorenzo,
the warning of unmerged systems will stop booting soon MUST
be in Debian.NEWS, preinst is the wrong place and it will be
very likely missed. NEWS is a well-known mechanism to convey
important information.
On the other hand, is this warning acutally required? Once this will
get a real issue, Depend: on usr-is-merged and you should
be set. If you cannot tell when that is, enforce it now, as non-merged
systems are no longer supported anyway.
There is a lintian warning:
W debian-news-entry-has-unknown-version
2.1.2-14 [usr/share/doc/getty-run/NEWS.Debian.gz:1]
Possibly this NEWS file can go, the version is older than
old-old-stable.
--
tobi
On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 07:05:41PM +0100, Lorenzo wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: normal
>
> Dear mentors,
>
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "runit-services":
>
> * Package name : runit-services
> Version : 0.7.1
> Upstream contact : [fill in name and email of upstream]
> * URL : [fill in URL of upstream's web site]
> * License : GPL-2.0+, BSD-3-Clause, CC0-1.0, GPL-3+
> * Vcs :
> https://salsa.debian.org/Lorenzo.ru.g-guest/runit-services Section
> : admin
>
> The source builds the following binary packages:
>
> runit-services - UNIX init scheme with service supervision (services)
>
> To access further information about this package, please visit the
> following URL:
>
> https://mentors.debian.net/package/runit-services/
>
> Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this
> command:
>
> dget -x
> https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/r/runit-services/runit-services_0.7.1.dsc
>
> Git repo:
> https://salsa.debian.org/Lorenzo.ru.g-guest/runit-services/-/tree/next?ref_type=heads
>
> Changes since the last upload:
>
> runit-services (0.7.1) experimental; urgency=medium
> .
> * Fix piuparts failure in package removal
> (Closes: #1062682)
> * update years in copyright.in and
> regenerate d/copyright
> Regards,
> Lorenzo
>
Reply to: