[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
] [
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
] [
Date Index
] [
Thread Index
]
Re: MIT license vs Expat license in packages
To
: SmartList <
debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
>
Subject
: Re: MIT license vs Expat license in packages
From
: David James <
davidjamescastor215@proton.me
>
Date
: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 16:34:55 +0000
Message-id
: <
[🔎]
PNzOYH1zCeo9ajs9AMJxgt-lGPB_sHfKb-CrWKvNYPXod2PXdMQQD6F-cM9NOsoUFBG6XX2bajVxMZGU3pVoGsHYPreL7G-yU4iJbjfoYCM=@proton.me
>
Hi,
> No. The MIT block and references should be gone (unless some files use a different version of the MIT license).
Perfect. Thank you.
Regards,
David James
Reply to:
debian-mentors@lists.debian.org
David James (on-list)
David James (off-list)
Prev by Date:
Re: MIT license vs Expat license in packages
Next by Date:
Bug#1060391: marked as done (RFS: selint/1.5.0-1 -- Static code analysis of refpolicy style SELinux policies)
Previous by thread:
Re: MIT license vs Expat license in packages
Next by thread:
Interservice-Industry Traning Simulation And Education Conference
Index(es):
Date
Thread