I’m not sure I understand what point you are trying to make. On Wednesday, March 15, 2023 12:35:07 PM MST Mezgani Ali wrote: > Look Storen, > > Qt WebEgine used 15 years ago for developing a Safari from scratch. > Debian/GNU Linux is more GTK side than Qt. > > > Kind regards, > > Mezgani Ali > +212 6 44 17 94 51 > ali.mezgani@nativelabs.ma > https://wiki.debian.org/mezgani > > ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Active member of IETF, GNU, Debian, FreeBSD and Kernel. > ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ > ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ > ⠈⠳⣄⠀ > > > On 15/03/2023, at 19:52, Soren Stoutner <soren@stoutner.com> wrote: > > > > Paul, > > > > The point is that these security updates are added upstream, they are > > regularly packaged in Debian, and it wouldn’t be any harder to support > > them in Debian stable than security updates for any other browser. Your > > original email indicated that none of these three things were true. > > > > Beyond that, you might find the following an interesting read (fairly > > long, but the point is that, as per the Chromium maintainer, Qt WebEngine > > has better coverage in Debian stable than Chromium does): > > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1020387#255 > > <https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1020387#255> Privacy > > Browser is not going to ship in Bookworm, but it will ship in Bookworm+1. > > Part of the reason why I have become one of the Qt maintainers is so > > that it receives proper security support in stable (and oldstable as much > > as possible, although there probably isn’t any web browser that currently > > has good security coverage in oldstable). > > > > Soren > > > > On Wednesday, March 15, 2023 11:34:58 AM MST Dmitry Shachnev wrote: > > > Hi all! > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 14, 2023 at 06:41:55PM -0700, Soren Stoutner wrote: > > > > Paul, > > > > > > > > I /am/ one of the Debian Qt WebEngine maintainers, and I also submit > > > > code > > > > to the upstream Qt project. > > > > > > > > The Salsa link you included appears to be a bit misinformed about > > > > security > > > > support for Qt WebEngine in Debian. For more accurate information, I > > > > would > > > > point you to this link: > > > > > > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1032794 > > > > > > Please note that this request is for a not-yet-released Debian version. > > > > > > I am not sure the Release team will agree to have such updates in > > > stable. > > > Although, I would be happy to discuss this with them. > > > > > > -- > > > Dmitry Shachnev > > > > -- > > Soren Stoutner > > soren@stoutner.com -- Soren Stoutner soren@stoutner.com
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.