Re: autopkgtest : s390x is considered regression but out of sync
On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 8:14 AM Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org> wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> On Fri, Oct 7, 2022 at 8:48 AM Mathieu Malaterre <malat@debian.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Paul !
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 9:59 AM Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2022-10-06 at 09:18 +0200, Tobias Frost wrote:
> > >
> > > > Oh, sorry; I missed that you meant d/test/control…
> > > > (Though, Reading [1], I'm not sure if there is support for "!", but I
> > > > guess it is worth a try…)
> > >
> > > elbrus confirmed on #debci that ! is supported in d/t/c Architecture.
> >
> > Ok then, thanks for the update. I'll wait a bit more maybe "s390x: No
> > test results" will clear out at some point:
> >
> > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/jpeg-xl
>
> This is a follow-up to my previous message. This time libjxl is build
> on s390x but the autopkgtest does not seems to see the new binaries:
>
> [...]
> E: Unable to locate package libjxl-devtools
> E: Unable to locate package libjpegxl-java
> run-unit-test FAIL badpkg
> [...]
>
> https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/s390x/j/jpeg-xl/30151566/log.gz
>
> Is there anything I should be doing on my side ?
I found the 'retry' button. Let's see how it goes.
Sorry for the noise
Reply to: