[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1055556: RFS: diff-pdf-wx/0.5.1-1 [ITP] -- Simple tool for visually comparing two PDF files



Control: tags -1 +moreinfo

On Wed, 8 Nov 2023 07:29:32 +0000 陈 晟祺 <harry-chen@outlook.com> wrote:
> Package: sponsorship-requests
> Severity: wishlist
> 
> Dear mentors,
> 
> I am looking for a sponsor for my package "diff-pdf-wx":
> 
> * Package name : diff-pdf-wx
> Version : 0.5.1-1
> Upstream contact : vaclav@slavik.io
> * URL : https://vslavik.github.io/diff-pdf/
> * License : GPL-2, LGPL-2.1+
> * Vcs : https://salsa.debian.org/harry/diff-pdf-wx
> Section : utils
> 
> The source builds the following binary packages:
> 
> diff-pdf-wx - Simple tool for visually comparing two PDF files
> 
> To access further information about this package, please visit the following URL:
> 
> https://mentors.debian.net/package/diff-pdf-wx/
> 
> Alternatively, you can download the package with 'dget' using this command:
> 
> dget -x https://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/d/diff-pdf-wx/diff-pdf-wx_0.5.1-1.dsc
> 
> Changes for the initial release:
> 
> diff-pdf-wx (0.5.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium
> .
> * Initial packging for upstream version 0.5.1 (closes: #1055543).
> 
> You may also find my git repo at:
> 
> https://salsa.debian.org/harry/diff-pdf-wx


Three issues:

* Please verify whether the project is mainly GPL-2.0-only or GPL-2.0-or-later.
I see that most of the source code files mention "or later" in their header files.
Please use SPDX license identifiers to avoid confusions.

* All copyright holders should be listed in debian/copyright. I believe your current
version is missing those holders shown in some source code comments.

* Please do not disable autoreconf whenever possible. This helps ensure the support of
future hardware architectures that are not present in the old configure scripts, e.g.
loong64 or riscv64. If autoreconf fails -- please contact upstream to fix it or do
some patches.

Thanks,
Boyuan Yang

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: