Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> writes: > Hello, > > On Sun 15 Oct 2023 at 10:46pm -07, Xiyue Deng wrote: > >> Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> writes: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> On Sun 15 Oct 2023 at 03:10pm +01, Sean Whitton wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> On Sun 15 Oct 2023 at 05:14am -07, Xiyue Deng wrote: >>>> >>>>> Sure! It's at https://salsa.debian.org/manphiz/bison-mode. FYI I have >>>>> also filed an RFS bug#1053987. >>>> >>>> Alright, pushed that to a team repo, let's work from there. >>> >>> It would be a good idea to push upstream's git tags to the repo, so that >>> I can just type 'git deborig'. >> >> Done. The `upstream' branch should be available now. > > I did mean the tags -- I myself prefer not to push an upstream branch. > The idea is that from our point of view the upstream source is > immutable, like tags, and unlike branches. But of course it's fine to > have one. Looks like I got confused about what you suggested as there was a "0.3" tag that was from the upstream repo which I assume "git deborig" can use so I thought an "upstream" may help more. I've now also pushed an "upstream/0.3" tag at the commit that matches the "0.3" tag, but not sure whether this is what you were referring to. If this works better I can remove the upstream branch to avoid further complications. Please advice. Thanks! -- Xiyue Deng
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature