Bug#1025372: RFS: nss-tls/1.1-1.1 [NMU] -- utility like nslookup(1), but uses libnss_tls.so instead of DNS

[Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl>]

On Sat, Dec 03, 2022 at 11:53:23AM +0100, Gioele Barabucci wrote:
> I am looking for a sponsor for a NMU of the package "nss-tls":

>  nss-tls (1.1-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
>  .
>    * Non-maintainer upload.
>    * d/libnss-tls.nss: Install NSS service `tls` via dh_installnss
>      (Closes: #1024688)

Hi!
Could you please follow the NMU procedure?  This is not a high-severity or
urgent bug, thus I see no reason to skip the rules.

The Policy has details, but in short: please post to a bug (in this case
#1024688) that you intend to do a NMU, adding a debdiff of the proposed
changes (in this case, the Salsa merge request should be enough).

Only then the clock starts ticking, which is 10 days for regular NMUs.
Of course, if you believe the maintainer won't react, uploading to
DELAYED/10 (which in this case is done by a sponsor) will fulfill this
requirement while not requiring you to remember to do an action in the
future.  But in either case, the intent-to-NMU mail is still required.


Meow!
-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ Quis trollabit ipsos trollos?
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀