On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 02:32:43PM +0000, Thomas Ward wrote: > When there's a rejected package there should be a rejection reason. > That's where you should start. Don't be discouraged, I've had my > packages rejected before (note: I'm not a mentor / DD, but I have been > through this process before), it hasn't stopped me from contributing > anywhere yet. Usually, when there's a rejection, there's a *reason* for > it and that reason should be documented somewhere and sent to you via > email - I would look for those rejection emails and see what the > reasoning was for the rejection. That's not the stated reason though: > the thought of having to wait several months again to see if everything is acceptable is really discouraging -- WBR, wRAR
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature