Bug#1010266: RFS: base16384/2.2.0-1 [ITP] -- Encode binary files to printable utf16be
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Thu, 21 Jul 2022 14:40:29 +0800 fumiama wrote:
Dear Bastian,
Now I have separated and re-uploaded the package into 3 parts as below.
- base16384: The binary file.
- libbase16384-2: The library.
- libbase16384-2-dev: The header and archive.
I wonder whether it is exactly what you meant.
Regards,
--
fumiama
Hi Fumiama,
In d/copyright you have to record the upstream copyright statement for Files: *
which is "Copyright (c) 2022 Fumiama Minamoto".
I yould prefer you to write your full name at every other "fumiama" instance instead but that is your choice.
d/control
=========
Please write a better Description for libbase16384-2. The .so file is not included there. lintian:
I: libbase16384-2: extended-description-is-probably-too-short
Use a the current debhelper-compat (= 13) instead of debhelper (>= 9) and get rid of the compat file.
This will eliminate:
W: base16384 source: no-versioned-debhelper-prerequisite 10
P: base16384 source: package-uses-old-debhelper-compat-version 10
lintian
=======
Please fix at least the following of the remaining lintian messages:
W: libbase16384-2: shared-library-lacks-prerequisites [usr/lib/libbase16384.so.2.2.0]
I: base16384 source: older-debian-watch-file-standard 3 [debian/watch]
I: libbase16384-2: symbols-file-missing-build-depends-package-field libbase16384.so.2 [symbols]
I: libbase16384-2: wrong-section-according-to-package-name utils => libs
I: libbase16384-2-dev: wrong-section-according-to-package-name utils => libdevel
When you are done, please untag moreinfo.
Thanks,
Bastian
Reply to: