On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 09:35:58PM +0200, Bastian Germann wrote: > When you have a pristine-tar branch please keep that updated. > I advise you to drop that branch. Else, please recreate it with 0.5.0 only. Thanks! Looks like I had it recreated but forgot to push it. Since it is not really that useful I just deleted it. > > The d/copyright shortnames should shorten .0 license version endings. > So GPL-3.0+ should be GPL-3+. Noted. > > Also licensed under GPL-3+ are the following files: > configure.ac > The Makefile.am files that are not already in d/copyright > > Please really check every file. > Ah, good point, thanks. I just audited every file that has a Copyright (C) line -- and doing that too for drgn (I did it before but didn't do a case insensitive search, and... turns out there's both (C) and (c). (also, per your next message - that's a handy tip about Salsa CI. I was just going by the dh output, I wonder if perhaps it should contain instructions about using the default CI recipe) Quick question (applies to drgn, not libkdumpfile) - if the tarball contains some m4 rules copied verbatim from autotools, do I have to list them in d/copyright? Thanks, -- Michel Alexandre Salim identities: https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature